A recent edition of the
Hopewell News, a Virginia newspaper reported, “A
Richmond attorney…has advised the Prince George County
School Board not to block a proposed Gay-Straight
Alliance club from forming at Prince George High
School.” “Should the issue be taken to court”, said
attorney D. Pat Lacy, Sr. of Richmond, “the school
system would lose.” (Gay-Straight Club Active at
PGHS, Hopewell News, Oct. 6, 2006)Common sense, traditional values Americans are outraged that schools are allowing Gay-Straight Alliances (GSA) into schools. They want to know who is behind these clubs and their true motivations.
The plain truth is that both the GSA and Gay, Lesbian, Straight Educators Network (GLSEN), the organization that registers GSAs, are part of a vast, interconnected network of Cultural Marxist front groups known collectively as the New Left. For over forty years, the New Left—a collection of Marxists, Stalinists, Trotskyites, Maoists, and anarchists have been waging a Gramscian style “quiet revolution” for the overthrow of Christianity and America’s Constitution, Rule of Law, sovereignty, and way of life.
While propagandists in the media have deftly kept the attention of most folks riveted on what they’ve been told to believe are the ‘real threats’ to America, such as gas prices, genuine Christianity, and mad cow disease, Marxist-trained psychopoliticians, propagandists, and change agents have descended upon the schools and are subjecting children and older youth to thought control and social re-engineering methodologies.
A position paper unwittingly published by the ACLU of Texas reveals why, “This generation of children will be the next generation of adult citizens who will make decisions on the directions this country will take. They will be molded by whatever education they receive.” (The ACLU vs. America, Alan Sears and Craig Osten, p 71)
Couple that candid
admission to the following, by Deanna Duby of the
National Educators Association (NEA), a staunch ally of
the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and GLSEN, “The fear of the Religious Right is that the schools of
today are the governments of tomorrow. And you know
what, they’re right.” (ibid, p. 71)
Note: ACLU, NEA, GLSEN, GSA on Communist Party USA
website: http://www.cpusa.org/link/group/0/
In the overthrowing of America, Cultural Marxists are utilizing a criminal methodology which originated in the USSR and whose ultimate goal can be characterized by its operative doctrine—nihilism. “Nihilism: originally in Russia, a social doctrine that defied all authority; revolutionism bent on the overthrow of all existing institutions.” (Funk and Wagnall’s Dictionary, 1948)
Two key strategies included within the doctrine of nihilism were added after WWI by two Marxist theoreticians, Antonio Gramsci and Georg Lukacs. These strategies had to do with how to destroy the Christian West, which both men concluded was the obstacle standing in the way of a communist new world order.
Gramsci posited that because Christianity had been dominant in the West for over 1600 years, it was therefore completely fused with Western civilization. The West, advised Gramsci, would have to be dechristianized and simultaneously atheitized by means of a “long march through the culture” so as to slowly infiltrate and then radically transform every cultural institution from the family, to the church, seminaries, schools, universities, judiciary, media, entertainment, politics, and political parties
Extreme (obscene) sex education was the strategy added by Lukacs. He reasoned that if Christian sexual ethics such as chastity (abstinence), fidelity, and monogamy could be undermined among children, then both the hated traditional family and Christianity would be dealt crippling blows. Towards this end, Lukacs launched radical sex education programs in the schools. Children, under the control of Bolshevik commissars, were force-fed atheism and instructed in all aspects of promiscuity while simultaneously encouraged to deride and reject their parents, pastors, and Christian moral ethics. All of this was accompanied by a reign of terror perpetrated against parents, priests, and other dissenters. Lukacs’ strategic method would later be brought to American schools by among others, the NEA, ACLU, GLSEN, and GSA.
In the following excerpts from, “Soviet Occupation of Poland, 1939” the application of Marxist criminal methodology can be plainly seen:
“Seeing their incapacity of making headway…to win over the population…Bolsheviks…direct all…efforts towards inculcating their principles in the young. As they have absolute power and no scruples, their methods can easily be imagined. Religion, Polish History and Literature, Latin and Greek were immediately removed from the curriculum (and the) schools submerged in worthless propaganda (which) is intended to destroy their hearer’s faith in everything they had hitherto been taught to love and respect.”
“Atheism is of great importance in the Bolshevik system of education. Even children in…nurseries are subjected to (it). A sort of maniacal stress is laid on the dissolution of morals. Soviet officers (teach about) sexual life in classrooms attended by little girls (and) explain that chastity was a prejudice of decayed bourgeoisie. The helpless indignation of parents forced to put up with…shameless inroads on everything they hold sacred can be imagined. Their helplessness and misery are callously discounted by those in power…every effort is made to undermine all feelings of respect and trust towards their parents.” (http://felsztyn.tripod.com/id15.html)
Nationwide, GLSEN has established GSAs in more than 3,000 Leftist controlled ‘indoctrination camps’ aka public schools. In bastions of Marxist control such as California and Massachusetts, GLSEN is brazenly ‘sensitizing’ youths into trying ‘diverse alternative’ lifestyle choices that decent people everywhere recoil in horror from. Both the infamous sadomasochistic “Fistgate” and “Little Black Book—Queer in the 21st Century” were sponsored in part by GLSEN. (Fistgate Special Report, http://www.massnews.com; The Little Black Book, Http://www.article8.org)
Towards the goal of perverting and subverting children, a California GSA had its middle and high school members march in the San Francisco Gay Pride Parade in June 2003. They mingled freely with nude males, topless females, and sadomasochists. Simulated sex acts were performed along the parade route. At least one sign read, “Sodomize me, it’s legal!” GLSEN used a yellow school bus to ferry youths to the parade. (Selling Homosexuality to America, www.coralridge.org, 2006)
Wherever GLSEN is resisted it fights back, often in partnership with the ACLU. Through threat of lawsuits and other intimidation tactics, the ACLU and GLSEN batter decent Americans into submission. For example, in Boyd County, KY, the ACLU and GLSEN used a court order to force children into attending psychopolitical “tolerance training.” When hundreds of parents tried to “opt out” their children, the ACLU threatened further legal action to force parents to surrender their children to GLSEN commissars.
In a WorldNetDaily article titled, “Gay Groups: We Have Rights to Your Children!” it states, “A collection of ‘gay’ organizations has filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Massachusetts claiming they have every right to teach their doctrine to grade-school students. Parental rights, according to the brief ‘have never meant that a parent can demand prior notice and the right to opt a child out…” The article reveals that the groups involved are major Marxist-progressive ‘gay’ rights proponents: the Human Rights Campaign, the ACLU, Mass. Teachers Assoc., Gay & Lesbian Advocates and Defenders. (WorldNetDaily, Oct. 6, 2006)
In an obvious effort at damaging the parent-child relationship, the ACLU—with help from GLSEN— published a manual audaciously titled, “Making Schools Safe.” This manual is a “blueprint for using schools to influence children to reject the values and beliefs of parents who oppose homosexuality.” (America vs. ACLU, p. 70)
In material to promote its
“Day of Silence, “ a psycho-political scheme
designed to encourage defiance by youth towards parents,
teachers, etc., GLSEN told children to “brainstorm” a
list of people, “who are likely to stand in your way” or
“expressed bias against LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual,
transgender) people.” The list can include teachers,
school board members, and relatives. Children were
advised that, “People who oppose your issue are…your
opponents.” (America vs. the ACLU, p 71).
Marxist-Progressives Who Fund the Subversion and Perversion of America’s Youth
On the bottom of the GSA
homepage it states, “GSA is a project of the Tides
Center.”
(http://www.gsanetwork.org/)
The Tides Center/Foundation funnels money from wealthy international and national donors—both individuals and foundations/institutes— to the New Left’s matrix of communist front groups. Essentially, the New Left is the “hired assassins” doing the dirty work for wealthy progressives who want America destroyed and don’t care about the criminal methods employed, but who don’t want to dirty their hands. Among wealthy individuals who donate to Tides is Teresa Heinz Kerry, who has donated more than $4 million. Another donor is multi-millionaire George Soros and his Shadow Party and Open Society Institute.
“The Tides ‘family’ of organizations is a nerve center of radical Shadow Party activity. George Soros has given more than $17 million to the Tides Center since 1999.” (The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party, David Horowitz and Richard Poe, p.126)
Other Marxist-progressive
funders include, for example:
Pew Charitable Trusts, Bill Moyers, Ford Foundation, and
John D. and Catherine T MacArthur Foundation
The Black Book of Communism recounts in horrific detail the crimes committed against humanity, culture, and civilization by adherents to the communist doctrine. Stephane Courtois, one of the books authors, characterizes communism as a criminal ideology. Former Pres. Reagan, a God-fearing man and one of America’s greatest leaders called the USSR an “empire of evil.”
How ironic that though the West won the Cold War, it is losing the ‘Culture War’ to the Church of Criminal Orthodoxy. While we were not paying attention it stealthily crept into America and began injecting its ‘moral insanity’ producing venom into America’s cultural institutions. Working under cover as multiculturalism, diversity, tolerance, sexual orientation, safe schools/safe sex, reproductive choice, porn as free speech, etc., the evil empire has entrenched itself right here in America.
As it works its destructive
black magic upon the America of our Founders, it
simultaneously takes control of America’s future—her
children. It is subverting and perverting them in much
the same way as was done to the children of Christian
Russia, Hungary, and Poland.
What Must We Do?
Americans must clear their minds of the psycho-politically-induced mind paste which prevents them from seeing the truth, which is that America was founded by God-fearing patriots who chose Christian principles on which to achieve independence. In the words of John Adams, “The…principles on which the fathers achieved independence were…the general principles of Christianity.” (Works, Vol. x, pp. 45-46, to Thomas Jefferson, June 28, 1813) When Gramsci and Lukacs pointed to Christianity as the obstacle preventing the establishment of a communist new world order, they were confessing to this truth.
If we wish to remain free, we must turn back to and rededicate ourselves to the source of our freedom and personal liberties: God the Creator and the principles of Christianity. Parents must protect their children and keep them out of the grasping hands of the Church of Criminal Orthodoxy. And as a people united by the principles of freedom and personal liberty, we must commit ourselves to the long and arduous fight to recapture every square inch of our culture, laws, and government and cleanse them of the corruptions caused by the Church of Criminal Orthodoxy.
Copyright Linda Kimball
2006
PatriotsandLiberty
http://patriotsandliberty.com/
http://lindakimball.com/
END
Read what some left-wing sicko public school teacher in California did...
A
California school system refuses to say what action, if any, it will take
after it received complaints about a kindergarten teacher who encouraged her
students to sign "pledge cards" in support of gays.
During a celebration of National Ally Week, Tara Miller, a teacher at the
Faith Ringgold School of Arts and Science in Hayward, Calif., passed out
cards produced by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network to her
class of kindergartners.
The cards asked signers to be "an ally" and to pledge to "not use anti-LGBT
(lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) language or slurs; intervene, when
I feel I can, in situations where others are using anti-LGBT language or
harassing other students and actively support safer schools efforts."
The school has acknowledged that the exercise was not appropriate for
kindergartners.
Parent Adela Voelker, who declined to be interviewed in depth for this
report, said she was furious when she found her child's signature on one of
the cards. She said she contacted a non-profit legal defense organization
specializing in parents' rights.
Meanwhile, a school board member, Jeff Cook, says some type of action should
be taken.
"We have a general rule that all instruction should be age appropriate, and
this clearly was not," said Cook, who has served on the school board for
five years.
SOURCE: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,445865,00.html
END
California schools' new
homosexual curriculum
2
bills take 'diversity' training to classroom effective Jan. 1
December 26, 2000
By Julie Foster
© 2008 WorldNetDaily.com
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Children attending
California government schools will soon be taught explicitly to avoid
"discriminatory attitudes and practices" toward homosexuals in
accordance with two new state laws that fund revised curriculum and
unspecified "tolerance" programs.
Assembly bills 1785 and 1931 were both passed in the Democrat-run legislature by a one-vote margin. While the latter went into effect immediately upon receiving a signature by Gov. Gray Davis on Sept. 30, the former goes into effect on Jan. 1.
Authored by former Assembly Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa, who left the Assembly this year due to term limits, AB 1785 requires "the State Board of Education to revise the state curriculum frameworks and guidelines and the moral and civic education curricula to include human relations education, with the aim of fostering an appreciation of the diversity of California's population and discouraging the development of discriminatory attitudes and practices," according to the state legislative counsel's digest. The "diversity" education must be incorporated into new state education frameworks to be adopted in 2008.
Additionally, AB 1785 would require a course on "human relations" as a prerequisite for receiving a teaching credential to teach "limited-English-proficient pupils," and would define "culture" and "cultural diversity" to mean "an understanding of human relations, including," among other things, "recognizing and responding to behavior related to bias based on race, color, religion, nationality, country of origin, ancestry, gender, disability, or sexual orientation."
The bill also requires schools to report "hate-motivated incidents and hate crimes" to the Department of Education, which in turn shares such information with the Justice Department.
"AB 1785 will help us identify and respond appropriately to hate crime hot spots," said Villaraigosa. "By improving the data collection about hate crimes occurring in our schools, we can more efficiently target our limited resources. We will better understand where and why these crimes are occurring. Only then can we begin to break the cycle of intolerance."
While the author of the bill focuses on hate-crimes reporting, critics point to what they say is "far-reaching language" that will "promote homosexuality and bisexuality to shape the attitudes of schoolchildren."
Pointing to provisions in the bill that authorize "coordination" with "private agencies," political activist Randy Thomasson said, "The bill will also empower homosexual organizations to come into the public schools."
"The bill would allow schools to use 'supplemental resources' from homosexual organizations," said Thomasson, executive director of Campaign for California Families. "We must ask, does this include resources such as those used in Massachusetts to train children how to engage in oral sex and 'fisting'? The bill language is very broad: It prohibits any 'bias on the basis of ... sexual orientation.' What form or part of sexual orientation does this not mean?"
But AB 1785 is not the only bill signed by Gov. Gray Davis that has family activists up in arms. Former Assemblyman Jack Scott's AB 1931 paves the way for school-aged children to be taken on field trips to "participate in educational programs focused on fostering ethnic sensitivity, overcoming racism and prejudice, and countering hatred and intolerance." The bill does not define "hatred" or "intolerance."
Specifically, the bill allows for the appropriation of $150,000 "to contract for the services of an organization with the experience to provide regional training programs throughout the state to assist school district personnel in the identification and determination of hate violence on school campuses, and allocate $2,000,000 for the purpose of providing grants on a competitive basis, as specified, to school districts and county offices of education to enable pupils and teachers to participate in educational programs focused on fostering ethnic sensitivity, overcoming racism and prejudice, and countering hatred and intolerance."
Thomasson said the bill "can easily be used to promote the homosexual agenda to schoolchildren. The bill funds subjective programs that are given carte blanche to deal with 'prejudice,' 'intolerance,' and 'hatred.' This lack of definition is very broad and far-reaching. The funding in the bill can therefore be given to homosexual groups to teach children to approve of homosexuality, bisexuality, transgenderism and transvestitism. There is no clear limit to the 'tolerance' subject matter contained in the bill."
Regarding the bill's funding of tolerance-related "educational programs, Thomasson asks, "Does this mean pro-gay conventions for teachers, such as GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network)? Does this mean pro-homosexuality events and field trips for students, such as 'Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender and Questioning Youth Lobby Day' at the State Capitol? All these 'programs' are quite possible because of the lack of definition and accountability in the bill."
GLSEN came under fire this year for its "Teach Out" in March, held at Tufts University, which featured Massachusetts Department of Education employees instructing children as young as 14 in how to properly perform homosexual sex acts. It also included a session to help teachers create a pro-homosexual environment in the classroom. The group maintains such conferences are necessary to prevent violence and abuse of homosexual children.
According to its mission statement, "GLSEN creates learning environments that affirm the inherent dignity of all students, and, in so doing, teaches them to respect and accept all of their classmates -- regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity. GLSEN believes that the key to ending anti-gay prejudice and hate-motivated violence is education. And it's for this reason that GLSEN brings together students, educators, families and other community members -- of any sexual orientation -- to reform America's educational system."
Through its self-described "groundbreaking" teacher-training materials, the organization hopes to "ensure that the next generation of Americans will live in a world without anti-gay prejudice."
But critics believe efforts of groups like GLSEN infringe on their free speech and religious rights. Many religious groups believe the practice of homosexuality is a serious sin and do not want their children taught that it is an acceptable lifestyle. Yet, through the efforts of the Democrat-dominated legislature in California, children are increasingly being taught just that, they complain.
"The pro-homosexual Democrats have imposed much of the homosexual agenda in California. The pro-family community is learning how to fight back. We have much work to do and the battle has just begun," Thomasson said enthusiastically, noting his group's efforts that contributed to the defeat of several pro-homosexual measures this year. "Concerned citizens must become active citizens who pledge their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to the defense of children and families. CCF will lead if people will step out in faith."
Democrats gained even more seats in the state's law-making body in the November election, giving the party a 50-30 majority in the Assembly and a 26-14 majority in the Senate.
SOURCE: California schools' new homosexual curriculum
END
